Today we’re going to do some experiments with the FilterValues function, which takes two return delimited lists for input…
FilterValues ( textToFilter ; filterValues )
…and produces the intersection of the two lists as output.
Today we’re going to do some experiments with the FilterValues function, which takes two return delimited lists for input…
FilterValues ( textToFilter ; filterValues )
…and produces the intersection of the two lists as output.
If you’ve generated JSON objects via FileMaker, you’re likely aware of the disparity between the order in which you specify the elements, and the order in which they subsequently appear (i.e., alphabetized by key name). As I wrote two years ago (in Thinking About JSON, Part 2)…
Both JSONSetElement and JSONFormatElements will automatically alphabetize key/value pairs within JSON objects. This can be disconcerting if you aren’t expecting it, but eventually you work through the stages of grief and come to accept that it’s just the way things are. The JSON Data Interchange Standard definition at json.org specifies that “An object is an unordered [emphasis mine] set of name/value pairs”, whereas an array is an “ordered collection of values”. In other words, by definition the order of the key/value pairs within JSON objects simply does not, and should not, matter.
Well… okay… you know that, and I know that, and FileMaker knows that, as do the JSON Jedi… but what if you are demonstrating a proof of concept to a client, and to avoid cognitive dissonance and unnecessary explanation you’d like to “doctor the evidence” (so to speak) and order the elements meaningfully?
For example, you’d like them to see this…
Long time readers of this blog will be familiar with the following scenario —
An ExecuteSQL expression is given, e.g.,
ExecuteSQL ( " SELECT SUM ( net_amount ) FROM cc_transactions WHERE batch_date = ? AND batch_region = ? AND card_type = ? " ; "" ; "" ; $theDate ; $theRegion ; $theCard )
…followed by a disclaimer along the lines of
For readability, static code has been used… in the real world I would employ robust coding practices to prevent accidental breakage due to field and/or TO renaming.
…with the link pointing to custom functions utilizing a combination of GetFieldName and Quote to ensure that using reserved words or potentially-problematical characters (such as a space or #) in table occurrence or field names, or renaming either of the preceding, will not break your SQL code. Continue reading “GetFieldName Revisited”
Demo file: virtual-list-simplified.zip
Note 1: The example in today’s article/demo is intentionally very basic.
Note 2: The demo is self-populating to keep the data current, so the values you see in the screen shots will not exactly match those you encounter in the demo.
Recently I had the pleasure of discussing virtual list with Paul Jansen and Jeremy Brown on The Context podcast. One consequence of having written so much on the subject over a period of many years, is that information has been spread across many articles. Another consequence is that my thinking re: certain implementation specifics has changed over time.
At the risk of stating the obvious, there are many, many ways to skin the virtual list cat, and the purpose of today’s article is not to say “this is the best way”, or imply that other approaches are flawed, but simply to propose one particular approach you might take — especially if you are either: a) new to virtual list, or b) already using virtual list, but aren’t completely happy with your current implementation.
At any rate, my aim today is to gather some useful insights from earlier articles into a single document (with an occasional new idea thrown in as well), and some of what follows has been recycled from those earlier articles. Continue reading “Virtual List Simplified”
As 2019 draws to a close, I am mildly astonished to note that FileMaker Hacks is now nine years old. As promised in my recent conversation with Jeremy Brown, and in response to a number of reader requests, here, for the first time, is a comprehensive table of contents.
While some of these articles have become obsolete, a surprising number of the older ones are still relevant today… a tribute to the continuity of FileMaker and how knowledge gained in one version can remain useful indefinitely.
Another aspect driven home for me during the compilation of this T.O.C. (which entailed revisiting 200+ articles — some of which I’d completely forgotten about) is what a profoundly collaborative effort this blog has been, not only thanks to the illustrious list of guest authors, but also due to the sheer volume of articles that, while written by me, would not have existed without the input, examples and inspiration provided by so many others in our community.
28 Dec 2019: Table of Contents has been moved to its own page, and will be updated as new articles appear.
Disclaimer: the technique shown in this article is provided on an as-is basis. Use with appropriate caution and at your own risk.
Demo file: JSON-Array-Custom-Functions.zip (requires FM 18 or later)
Have you ever noticed that FileMaker does not provide a JSON function to insert a new element into an existing array? For example, given this array (and bearing in mind that JSON uses a zero-based index)…
[ “A” , “B” , “C” , “D” ]
…JSONSetElement ( array ; 2 ; “XXX” ) will transform it to…
[ “A” , “B” , “XXX” , “D” ]
… but we have no native JSON function to “push” a new element into position 2 so that existing elements slide one position rightward to accommodate, like so:
[ “A” , “B” , “XXX” , “C” , “D” ]